Questions » History » Version 5
Quentin Labourey, 2018-04-05 17:52
| 1 | 1 | Quentin Labourey | h1. Questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | |||
| 3 | 5 | Quentin Labourey | h2. Concerning DFNs and associated data types |
| 4 | |||
| 5 | [[Discussion on DFNs integration/interfaces]] |
||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | --- |
||
| 8 | 1 | Quentin Labourey | |
| 9 | *Q.*: How are we going to use the ASN1 data types defined in InnFuse inside Genom3? |
||
| 10 | *A.*: Used the compiled C structs from the ASN.1 compiler |
||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | --- |
||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | *Q.*: How are the different frames defined (world, site, robot...)? |
||
| 15 | *A.*: Check frame definition in D5.2 |
||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | --- |
||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | *Q.*: How should DFNs be organized ? E.g. do all optimization DFNs (such as graph optimization) belong ONLY to DPM? Or can they also be included in other DFPCs? |
||
| 20 | *A.*: Day 3512 and the fight is still going on about this. |
||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | h2. Concerning experimental evaluation |
||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | 3 | Quentin Labourey | *Q.*: Do we have a real interrobot communication on the field? |
| 25 | *A.*: No. Every communication will go through a ground station. Multi robot scheme and setup still needs to be defined. |
||
| 26 | 1 | Quentin Labourey | |
| 27 | h2. Misc. |
||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | *Q.*: Which tools are we using to tracking the actions? |
||
| 30 | *A.*: Wiki pages, Mind maps, TBD |
||
| 31 | |||
| 32 | --- |
||
| 33 | |||
| 34 | *Q.*: Should we propose a scientific workshop? |
||
| 35 | *A.*: If yes, subject TBD |
||
| 36 | 4 | Quentin Labourey | |
| 37 | --- |
||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | *Q.*: Should we take an (some) intern(s)? |
||
| 40 | *A.*: With a narrowed down subject, it could be possible, e.g. make them work on the different instances of a given DFN (test different visual extractors...) |
||
| 41 | |||
| 42 | --- |
||
| 43 | |||
| 44 | *Q.*: What sensors should we use? |
||
| 45 | *A.*: Simon? |